Review



microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k  (Illumina Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Illumina Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Illumina Inc microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k
    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
    Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling Illumina 27k, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray-based+dna+methylation+profiling/pmc07286740-150-5-8?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Genetic and epigenetic pathways in Down syndrome: insights to the brain and immune system from humans and mouse models"

    Article Title: Genetic and epigenetic pathways in Down syndrome: insights to the brain and immune system from humans and mouse models

    Journal: Progress in brain research

    doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.09.002

    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
    Figure Legend Snippet: DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.

    Techniques Used: Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Mutagenesis



    Similar Products

    microarray‐based dna methylation profiling  (DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS)
    90
    DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS microarray‐based dna methylation profiling
    Microarray‐Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray-based+dna+methylation+profiling/pmc11670297-89-9-5?v=DIAGENODE+DIAGNOSTICS
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray‐based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k
    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
    Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling Illumina 27k, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray-based+dna+methylation+profiling/pmc07286740-150-5-8?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    microarray-based dna methylation profiling  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc microarray-based dna methylation profiling
    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
    Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray-based+dna+methylation+profiling/pmc03992038-122-0-14?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    microarray-based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling  (Illumina Inc)
    90
    Illumina Inc universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling
    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
    Universal Beadarrays Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray-based+dna+methylation+profiling/pm19750229-59-4-29?v=Illumina+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.

    Journal: Progress in brain research

    Article Title: Genetic and epigenetic pathways in Down syndrome: insights to the brain and immune system from humans and mouse models

    doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.09.002

    Figure Lengend Snippet: DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.

    Article Snippet: In our initial work, microarray-based DNA methylation profiling (Illumina 27K) in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) from individuals with DS and age-matched controls revealed gains and losses of DNA methylation, strongly affecting ~100 genes, as a consistent epigenetic response to Ts21 in these cells ( Kerkel et al. 2010 ).

    Techniques: Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Mutagenesis